Welcome To My World. My
name is Jocelyne Hudson-Brown and for the next few blog postings I will
concentrate of the matter of “ethics”. Although I’d like to take credit for
this highbrow endeavor, I cannot; it was assigned as an ongoing task by my
professors for a class on “Media Ethics”. Come on, follow me and let’s begin
our walk down the highroad…
“Communication(s)” is my profession of choice. Being an
effective communicator is a great responsibility as the information you are
providing influences lives. The better you are at it the more people
influenced. As I move forward toward becoming an expert in the field the
prevailing ethical question for me is (has been) ”the message.” What am I
putting out there? Utilizing the oath of honesty “the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth” is a good tool to use as a measurement device.
Early on as an undergraduate I asked one of my professors
what the definition of “spin” was? He told me “spin” was the equivalent of lying.
It may have been bit of a stretch (and harsh) for an answer, but the sentiment
of it has never left me. The highlight of my last few projects has been my
hiring as the communications director/spokesperson on a couple of political
campaigns. Trust me, these folks are major beneficiaries of “spin”. Winning is
everything and it is not a game for the faint of heart or for those overly concerned
about the simple matter of ethics.
Navigating ethical dilemmas in the field of communications for a political campaign is like running a footrace through a minefield. One may indeed reach the finish line but not without an explosion or two. If you are lucky you still have your limbs upon completion. No matter, you will have left some part of your soul on the field. This analogy applies to winners as well as losers.
Navigating ethical dilemmas in the field of communications for a political campaign is like running a footrace through a minefield. One may indeed reach the finish line but not without an explosion or two. If you are lucky you still have your limbs upon completion. No matter, you will have left some part of your soul on the field. This analogy applies to winners as well as losers.
Ethical scenarios most commonly encountered in this arena go
from when (if at all) to put out certain information regarding the other candidate? Who is doing what? Where is the money coming
from? The last two items are public information and legally must be clearly
defined.
There are no shortages of examples of ethics violations in
the field of communication for politics and the messages fed to the public.
History both past and present is chock full of examples where the messages
conveyed to the masses were “spun”, some with a healthy assist from the media.
One of the items that came to mind quickly was the issue of weapons of mass destruction as a reason for going to war with Iraq. No evidence of these weapons was uncovered as testified to by many entities, only the word of then President Bush. Yet, the media got on the bandwagon and spoon-fed this lie to the American people. Those that refused paid a hefty price. That of being cutoff, of being denied access to power. Woodward and Bernstein (Watergate) never backed down and were eventually fully supported in their efforts by the Washington Post. And of course there is Hitler and the non-reporting of the atrocities that were performed at his behest. The New York Times did do some reporting on the concentration camps, however, the stories were buried on the bottom of the back pages.
Sometimes the media is at the forefront of truth telling and sometimes only reports "objectively" once it has no other choice. In each case heavy coverage by the media to uncover truths and present them to a public that would have been outraged by the lies much earlier would have certainly saved many lives.
One of the items that came to mind quickly was the issue of weapons of mass destruction as a reason for going to war with Iraq. No evidence of these weapons was uncovered as testified to by many entities, only the word of then President Bush. Yet, the media got on the bandwagon and spoon-fed this lie to the American people. Those that refused paid a hefty price. That of being cutoff, of being denied access to power. Woodward and Bernstein (Watergate) never backed down and were eventually fully supported in their efforts by the Washington Post. And of course there is Hitler and the non-reporting of the atrocities that were performed at his behest. The New York Times did do some reporting on the concentration camps, however, the stories were buried on the bottom of the back pages.
Sometimes the media is at the forefront of truth telling and sometimes only reports "objectively" once it has no other choice. In each case heavy coverage by the media to uncover truths and present them to a public that would have been outraged by the lies much earlier would have certainly saved many lives.
I’d like to think that the lessons taught by my parents
combined with a bit of spirituality and a formal education have given me the
tools needed to make ethical decisions. In addition, having grown into a mature adult
and undergone my own life experiences has also provided tools that can only be
obtained when faced with real world challenges.
In all honesty most of the decisions I’ve made within the context of my career have been ethical, early on (20+ years ago) some may have been a bit questionable (too eager to please, rationalizing the end result), none were illegal. When working with politicians the question of "What would I say if I had to testify?" is always on my mind. Going to jail (or the possibility thereof) is where I draw the line.
In all honesty most of the decisions I’ve made within the context of my career have been ethical, early on (20+ years ago) some may have been a bit questionable (too eager to please, rationalizing the end result), none were illegal. When working with politicians the question of "What would I say if I had to testify?" is always on my mind. Going to jail (or the possibility thereof) is where I draw the line.
The lessons I’ve learned from the current reading of the
course materials have provided me with various theories as to the how and whys of making ethical
decisions and the foundation(s) upon which these theories are based.
With regard to what I’d like to see in addressed in class, maybe
be some ethics situations in which we could apply decision making on the
spot. Case studies are great but most bad decisions are made on a moments
notice and not after a lot of thought and a good nights sleep. Perhaps some
sort of role playing would be interesting where we have to make snap decisions
(even with a raising of the hand) and then finding out the result of those
decisions.
References:
Arnettetal - Ch3 - 2
http://www.slate.com
No comments:
Post a Comment